News from Germany and the world RSS Calm mode: off
DE EN
deublitz.de
Latest
Technology

Could this be a Deep Blue moment for the cryptic crossword?

A computer program has finally oudone humans at solving cryptic crosswords. Plus, more from around the puzzleverse• Don’t get Cluesletter, our weekly puzzles newsletter, delivered to your inbox? Sign up hereWhen the IBM supercomputer Deep Blue beat Garry Kasparov at chess in 1997, it was an early victory for artificial intelligence over the human mind, and the culmination of decades of attempts. Almost 30 years later, a computer program has finally outdone humans at solving cryptic crosswords.Earlier this month, a model called Darmok solved the final puzzle of the Times’s annual cryp...

Could this be a Deep Blue moment for the cryptic crossword?

A computer program has finally outdone humans at solving cryptic crosswords. Plus, more from around the puzzleverse

Don’t get Cluesletter, our weekly puzzles newsletter, delivered to your inbox? Sign up here

When the IBM supercomputer Deep Blue beat Garry Kasparov at chess in 1997, it was an early victory for artificial intelligence over the human mind, and the culmination of decades of attempts. Almost 30 years later, a computer program has finally outdone humans at solving cryptic crosswords.

Earlier this month, a model called Darmok solved the final puzzle of the Times’s annual cryptic crossword competition about three minutes faster than Liam Hughes, 29, who became the contest’s youngest (human) winner.

After Deep Blue’s victory, the New York Times’s puzzle editor, Will Shortz, set engineers a challenge. “Is the computer going to be able to solve the clues involving puns and wordplay? I don’t think so,” he wrote. “In a much more wide-ranging and, frankly, complex game like crosswords, we humans still rate just fine.”

Less than a decade later, a computer named WebCrow beat 75 human crossworders at an AI conference, and by 2021 a program named Dr Fill “won” the American crossword puzzle tournament, the most prestigious of its type for American-style crosswords, which rely on a combination of general knowledge, allusion and double meanings.

But cryptics are much trickier, and as recently as 2024 my colleague Alan Connor was asking: “Will the cryptic crossword remain the last thing AI can’t conquer?”

Dr Sid Chatterjee, a computer scientist at the University of Texas in Austin, thought not, and in 2025 set out to prove it. He began work on Darmok, named after a Star Trek episode in which the crew attempt to converse with a species that speaks only in allegories – an experience akin to solving a cryptic.

Darmok’s first tilt at the Times championship ended in failure when it gave up on the final puzzle after 18 minutes. Its triumph this year was partly as a result of successfully solving a clue that tripped up three of the five finalists, including 14-time champion Mark Goodliffe:

double quotation markWolf trap missing its lowest crosspiece? (5)”

The letters filled in as part of other clues gave the pattern S_A_F. Both SCARF and SNARF mean “to eat greedily” (synonyms for “wolf”) but the rest of the wordplay relied on a visual element.

“Trap” indicates the synonym “SNARE”, and when the bottom line of the E is removed – “missing its lowest crosspiece” – it becomes an F, making SNARF the answer.

While one might expect visual clues like these to be more difficult for an AI, Chatterjee said he couldn’t detect a pattern in the types of clues Darmok struggles most with. It does find puzzles by John Henderson (known to Guardian readers as Enigmatist) harder than most, though.

If you’d like to challenge yourself against Darmok, it solved this Fed crossword from last week in four minutes and 10 seconds. Good luck.

Darmok is based on four AI models: Gemini 3.1 Pro, Claude Fable 5, GPT-5 and GPT-6 Astra. The solving is primarily done by the first two, with the others joining in if needed. Chatterjee attributed Darmok’s improvement this year to the extra power behind these frontier models, as well as some of his refinements, such as making Darmok wait until it had attempted all the clues before inserting answers.

The next frontier for AI and cryptic crosswords – setting a satisfying puzzle – will be an even bigger jump. “It is a very, very difficult problem because you have got to make a sentence that parses both in normal English and in cryptic English smoothly, and those two grammars are very, very different,” said Chatterjee. “If [beating humans at cryptic crosswords] was the Mount Everest challenge, I call this next one the Olympus Mons challenge.”

double quotation markProportion of inspiration and perspiration? It’s roughly 45% and 42% (5)

From Bluebird in the Independent. The answer, RATIO, is hidden in the clue twice, making up five of the 11 letters in “inspiration” – or roughly 45% – and five of the 12 letters in “perspiration” – roughly 42%.

Congratulations to Tony Kelly (Montano) for winning this week’s competition with his clue for the word DEBUT:

double quotation markKick-off leads to decisive early goal for PSG (5)

Kick-off is the definition. “Leads to” indicates the first letters of decisive and early, ie DE, and “goal for PSG” refers to the football team Paris Saint-Germain, indicating BUT, the French word for goal.

This week, as a nod to the word wrongly identified by solvers in the Times championship, we’d like you to come up with a clue for the word SCARF. Please send entries to [email protected].

To read the complete version of this newsletter including the exclusive Letter Adder game, subscribe to receive Cluesletter in your inbox every Tuesday.

Source: The Guardian ›

Comments (0)

No comments yet.

Comments are reviewed before they are published.
Google disruption causes bank failures
Technology

Google disruption causes bank failures

A power outage at a Google data center is currently causing problems, especially at British banks. The direct bank ING was also paralysed for hours, but there should not be a connection.

Spiegel Negative
‘It was so satisfying when I threw a rock through the screen’: the people sick of being spied on by their smart TV
Technology

‘It was so satisfying when I threw a rock through the screen’: the people sick of being spied on by their smart TV

Is your television listening to every conversation? Filling your home with highly invasive ads? Some viewers have had enough of tech violating their privacyWhen Dan had had enough of his television, he threw a rock straight through the screen. The offence? His smart TV was downloading its third update in three days. “It drove me crazy with what seemed like daily software updates that never fixed anything and ‘features’ that never seemed to work,” says the 71-year-old from Illinois. “And of course, constantly trying to push me to subscribe to paid-for services when all I wanted to do...

The Guardian Negative
The dangers of letting tech billionaires shape our world
Technology

The dangers of letting tech billionaires shape our world

As SpaceX impacts Ukraine and AI-generated music divides artists and fans, critics are asking what happens when technology has too much control over our livesThis was originally published in TechScape, a newsletter about how technology shapes our lives. Sign up to receive it hereHello, and welcome to TechScape. I’m Blake Montgomery, US tech editor at the Guardian, writing to you while sitting in front of Roy Lichtenstein’s monumental Drowning Girl, on view in New York City. Today in tech, we’re discussing the perils of Elon Musk’s one-man global infrastructure, AI-generated music, an...

The Guardian Negative
Labor and the Coalition are poised to take a reckless gamble on AI. Haven’t they realised community support has collapsed? | Edward Santow and Sarah Sacher
Technology

Labor and the Coalition are poised to take a reckless gamble on AI. Haven’t they realised community support has collapsed? | Edward Santow and Sarah Sacher

Australian workers expect the government to act to protect them from AI harms. There is a clear reform solution at handGet our new political email, free app or daily news podcastAustralia’s major political parties are edging towards rare consensus. Labor and the Coalition increasingly want to take a major bet on artificial intelligence. Yet, just as the parties are coming together, the Australian community is running the other way.Last year, only 30% of Australians believed the benefits of AI outweighed the risks. In 2026, community trust in AI appears to be falling even further. Con...

The Guardian Negative